Buffermon
← ALL AGENTS / APPSHIELD
ASAPPLICATION SECURITY

Find the paths
that shouldn’t exist.

We’re building AppShield to investigate how your application behaves, follow potential attack paths, and turn scattered findings into something your team can act on.

Explore the scope ↓
In developmentAppShield / Planned product
THE INVESTIGATION MODELCONCEPT / 3D
CONTEXT INEVIDENCE OUTPURPOSE-BUILT SECURITY AGENT.
DRAG TO INSPECT
APPSHIELD / PLANNED FOCUS
Web applicationsAPIsAccess control
01 / WHERE APPLICATION RISK HIDESAppShield

A login doesn’t decide who gets access.

A request can be authenticated and still reach data it should never see. The interesting question is how identity, object ownership, and business logic interact across the full request path.

THE INVESTIGATION QUESTION

Which account can perform which action on which resource—and where that boundary is enforced.

AS / A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEWCONCEPTUAL
Potential pathConceptual view · Application security
01 / WHERE IT STARTS

A valid session, an API route, or a user-controlled object identifier.

02 / WHY IT MATTERS

A permission check can exist in one path and be missing from another. The difference changes what a user can reach.

03 / WHAT TO INVESTIGATE

Which account can perform which action on which resource—and where that boundary is enforced.

02 / PLANNED CAPABILITIES

Built to go
a layer deeper.

The work we’re designing AppShield to do.
Scope and availability will evolve as we build.

01

Map the reachable surface

Discover routes, inputs, and authentication boundaries within an explicitly defined scope.

02

Investigate access paths

Examine how roles, sessions, and object permissions interact across your application.

03

Explain the finding

Bring the affected path, supporting evidence, and suggested next steps into one reviewable finding.

THE HANDOFF / WHAT GOES IN, WHAT COMES BACK
PLANNED INPUTS

Give the agent context.

Application routes, API definitions, scoped test accounts, and expected access rules.

PLANNED OUTPUTS

Bring back something useful.

Affected paths, access conditions, supporting evidence, and remediation guidance.

THE BOUNDARY

Inputs stay within an agreed scope. Findings and proposed actions are designed for your team to review. Exact integrations and data handling requirements will be defined as the product develops.

03 / AN EXAMPLE INVESTIGATION

From a signal
to a next step.

A conceptual example of the workflow we’re designing. This is an illustration, not a live scan or product output.

AS / INVESTIGATION NOTEILLUSTRATIVE

Object access boundary

GET /api/projects/:id
OBSERVATION
A project identifier crosses a tenant boundary.
INVESTIGATE
Compare permitted and unexpected access with scoped test accounts.
NEXT STEP
Review ownership checks before returning project data.
04 / FROM ROUTE TO REVIEW

Planned workflow for AppShield. Inputs, integrations, and supported actions will evolve during development.

ANIMATED 3D WORKFLOW / CONCEPT

A conceptual workflow for AppShield. Select a stage to highlight the part of the investigation it supports.

01

Set the boundaries

Define your application, test environment, and permitted actions.

02

Follow the paths

The agent examines reachable behavior and investigates potential weaknesses.

03

Review the evidence

Your team reviews findings and decides which fixes to make.

CHOOSING THE RIGHT AGENT

Where AppShield
fits.

START HERE WHEN

You need to investigate the behavior of a scoped application or API, including what different accounts can reach.

A RELATED QUESTION

For the implementation behind a finding, Code Guardian focuses on call chains and source-level data flow.

CGCode Guardian

These are planned areas of focus. Cross-agent integrations and supported workflows are still being defined.

05 / A FEW QUESTIONS

Before you
ask.

Can I use AppShield today?+

AppShield is in development. We’re open to early conversations about your use case and can share progress as the product takes shape.

Will AppShield test production?+

The planned workflow starts with an agreed scope and a suitable test environment. Targets and permitted actions should be explicitly defined by your team.

Does it replace a penetration test?+

We’re building an agent to support continuous investigation. We’re not claiming that it replaces every form of expert assessment or independent security review.

NEXT IN THE LINEUP

Code Guardian

BUILT IN THE OPEN. SHAPED WITH YOU.

Your next security
hire might be an agent.

Tell us what your team needs. Help shape what comes next.

EARLY CONVERSATIONS

Let’s build
something safer.

We’re developing the agents. Tell us what you’d want them to work on.

Opens a draft in your email app. Nothing is sent automatically.