Buffermon
← ALL AGENTS / DEPENDENCY ARMOR
DASOFTWARE SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY

Know what
you’re bringing in.

Dependency Armor is being designed to examine third-party components, connect advisories to your dependency graph, and help your team work out a practical path forward.

Explore the scope ↓
In developmentDependency Armor / Planned product
THE INVESTIGATION MODELCONCEPT / 3D
CONTEXT INEVIDENCE OUTPURPOSE-BUILT SECURITY AGENT.
DRAG TO INSPECT
DEPENDENCY ARMOR / PLANNED FOCUS
Dependency graphAdvisory contextUpgrade paths
01 / WHERE SUPPLY CHAIN RISK HIDESDependency Armor

A package alert isn’t the whole story.

A component can arrive through another dependency, and an advisory may depend on specific versions or usage. The next step needs more context than a package name and a severity label.

THE INVESTIGATION QUESTION

How the component entered the build, which conditions apply, and what a tested upgrade would change.

DA / A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEWCONCEPTUAL
Potential pathConceptual view · Software supply chain security
01 / WHERE IT STARTS

A direct package, a nested component, or a version resolved by a lockfile.

02 / WHY IT MATTERS

The same advisory can lead to different decisions depending on the dependency path, affected behavior, and compatibility constraints.

03 / WHAT TO INVESTIGATE

How the component entered the build, which conditions apply, and what a tested upgrade would change.

02 / PLANNED CAPABILITIES

Built to go
a layer deeper.

The work we’re designing Dependency Armor to do.
Scope and availability will evolve as we build.

01

Understand the graph

Examine direct and transitive components in your software.

02

Contextualize advisories

Connect affected versions and reported conditions to your project’s dependency usage.

03

Plan the next version

Identify upgrade options and the compatibility questions your team should verify.

THE HANDOFF / WHAT GOES IN, WHAT COMES BACK
PLANNED INPUTS

Give the agent context.

Manifests, lockfiles, software inventory, and compatibility constraints.

PLANNED OUTPUTS

Bring back something useful.

Contextualized advisories, affected dependency paths, and upgrade options to test.

THE BOUNDARY

Inputs stay within an agreed scope. Findings and proposed actions are designed for your team to review. Exact integrations and data handling requirements will be defined as the product develops.

03 / AN EXAMPLE INVESTIGATION

From a signal
to a next step.

A conceptual example of the workflow we’re designing. This is an illustration, not a live scan or product output.

DA / INVESTIGATION NOTEILLUSTRATIVE

A vulnerable transitive component

application → library → dependency
OBSERVATION
A nested component matches an affected version range.
INVESTIGATE
Check the parent package, relevant usage, and available fixed versions.
NEXT STEP
Review the parent upgrade path and run compatibility checks.
04 / FROM INVENTORY TO A TESTED UPGRADE

Planned workflow for Dependency Armor. Inputs, integrations, and supported actions will evolve during development.

ANIMATED 3D WORKFLOW / CONCEPT

A conceptual workflow for Dependency Armor. Select a stage to highlight the part of the investigation it supports.

01

Share the inventory

Start from manifests, lockfiles, or an available software inventory.

02

Investigate relevance

The agent relates advisories and version constraints to the dependency graph.

03

Review the upgrade

Your team evaluates suggested changes and tests the resulting build.

CHOOSING THE RIGHT AGENT

Where Dependency Armor
fits.

START HERE WHEN

You need to understand a component advisory in the context of your dependency graph and a realistic upgrade path.

A RELATED QUESTION

For broader threat reports and emerging signals relevant to your stack, start with Threat Radar.

TRThreat Radar

These are planned areas of focus. Cross-agent integrations and supported workflows are still being defined.

05 / A FEW QUESTIONS

Before you
ask.

Can I use Dependency Armor today?+

Dependency Armor is in development. We’re open to early conversations about your use case and can share progress as the product takes shape.

Is this just a list of vulnerable packages?+

The direction is to go further than a list: investigate why an advisory may matter to a project and help identify a useful next action.

Which package managers are planned?+

The supported ecosystems are still being defined. Share your manifests and tooling preferences in an early conversation.

NEXT IN THE LINEUP

Threat Radar

BUILT IN THE OPEN. SHAPED WITH YOU.

Your next security
hire might be an agent.

Tell us what your team needs. Help shape what comes next.

EARLY CONVERSATIONS

Let’s build
something safer.

We’re developing the agents. Tell us what you’d want them to work on.

Opens a draft in your email app. Nothing is sent automatically.