Context is an input.
Inventory, architecture, expected behavior, and permitted scope give an investigation its boundaries. The agent should know what it is examining and why.
TECHNOLOGY / HOW THE AGENTS WORKContext in.
Context in.
Clarity out.
An agent should do more than produce a confident answer. We’re designing a working loop that gathers context, investigates a question, and brings back evidence your team can evaluate.
THE INVESTIGATION MODELCONCEPT / 3D
CONTEXT INEVIDENCE OUTPURPOSE-BUILT SECURITY AGENT.DRAG TO INSPECT
Work through the problem.
Show the working.
ANIMATED 3D WORKFLOW / CONCEPT
A conceptual working loop. Select a stage to focus the 3D diagram.
Evidence is the output.
A finding should make its basis visible: relevant paths, observations, sources, and uncertainty. Confidence without a traceable basis is not the goal.
Control stays with people.
Your team evaluates recommendations and controls consequential changes. The working model is investigation with review, rather than unchecked execution.
Explicit scope.
Define the targets, data, and actions an agent may work with. Permissions should be understandable before an investigation begins.
Reviewable reasoning.
Make it possible to follow how a finding was reached and where more verification is needed.
Useful handoffs.
Bring the next step into the tools and workflows a team already uses. Specific integrations are still being developed.
Different surfaces.
The same discipline.
Application behavior, source code, dependencies, and compliance evidence need different methods. Each planned product has a focused role inside the same context–investigation–review loop.
Explore the agentsInvestigation and action
need different permissions.
The intended workflow keeps the decision visible at each handoff. Implementation details remain in development.
TaskPlanned agent roleTeam responsibility
Inspect context
Read the selected inputs and identify relevant paths.
Choose the scope and grant suitable access.
Investigate a finding
Follow evidence, check assumptions, and surface uncertainty.
Evaluate the basis of the finding.
Propose a next step
Explain a focused fix, upgrade, or follow-up.
Approve consequential changes and validate the result.