A document, system export, review record, or ownership handoff.
Make the evidence
work for you.
Compliance Vault is being built to help organize evidence, relate it to security controls, and show teams where documentation needs attention before the next review.
Evidence ages. Controls don’t wait.
A policy, a review record, and a screenshot can all look relevant while covering different systems or periods. An evidence folder alone doesn’t show whether a control is supported today.
Which requirement the material supports, who owns it, and whether its period and scope match the review.
Dates, scope, and responsibilities drift. Evidence may describe a control without demonstrating the required coverage.
Which requirement the material supports, who owns it, and whether its period and scope match the review.
Built to go
a layer deeper.
The work we’re designing Compliance Vault to do.
Scope and availability will evolve as we build.
Organize the evidence
Gather and categorize the materials your team chooses to provide.
Connect it to controls
Suggest mappings between evidence and relevant requirements for human review.
Find the missing pieces
Identify gaps, stale materials, and questions that need an owner.
Give the agent context.
The control set, review period, evidence materials, and their responsible owners.
Bring back something useful.
Suggested evidence mappings, potential coverage gaps, and owner follow-up questions.
Inputs stay within an agreed scope. Findings and proposed actions are designed for your team to review. Exact integrations and data handling requirements will be defined as the product develops.
From a signal
to a next step.
A conceptual example of the workflow we’re designing. This is an illustration, not a live scan or product output.
An access review needs evidence
control requirement → review record- OBSERVATION
- A supplied review record may not cover the requested period.
- INVESTIGATE
- Compare the evidence dates, owner, and required review scope.
- NEXT STEP
- Request the current review and validate its coverage.
Planned workflow for Compliance Vault. Inputs, integrations, and supported actions will evolve during development.
A conceptual workflow for Compliance Vault. Select a stage to highlight the part of the investigation it supports.
Set the review scope
Choose the control set and evidence your team wants to examine.
Map the materials
The agent relates supplied evidence to controls and identifies potential gaps.
Review with an owner
Your team validates mappings and follows up on missing or outdated evidence.
Where Compliance Vault
fits.
You have a control set and selected evidence, and need to find mappings, coverage gaps, or stale material.
If a gap calls for investigating application behavior, AppShield is designed for that technical question.
ASAppShieldThese are planned areas of focus. Cross-agent integrations and supported workflows are still being defined.
Before you
ask.
Can I use Compliance Vault today?+
Compliance Vault is in development. We’re open to early conversations about your use case and can share progress as the product takes shape.
Does it guarantee certification?+
No. Certification and compliance decisions depend on the applicable requirements and qualified reviewers. The product is being designed to support evidence work.
Which frameworks will be supported?+
Framework coverage is still being defined. Let us know which requirements drive your team’s reviews so we can prioritize the roadmap.