A parameter enters through a route, handler, parser, or message consumer.
Follow the logic.
Find the weakness.
Code Guardian is being built to trace security-sensitive logic across your source code, examine how data moves, and propose changes with evidence a developer can review.
The dangerous path crosses files.
Input handling, validation, and sensitive operations often live in different parts of a codebase. Looking at a suspicious line in isolation can miss the behavior that makes it safe or unsafe.
The call chain, the trust assumptions, and the checks between entry and sensitive use.
The data may pass through several helpers before reaching a query, command, file operation, or authorization decision.
The call chain, the trust assumptions, and the checks between entry and sensitive use.
Built to go
a layer deeper.
The work we’re designing Code Guardian to do.
Scope and availability will evolve as we build.
Trace data through code
Investigate how untrusted input reaches sensitive operations across functions and files.
Read the surrounding context
Examine validation, authorization, and error handling around a potential issue.
Propose a reviewable fix
Explain the affected flow and suggest a focused change for a developer to evaluate.
Give the agent context.
A selected repository or change set, language context, and permitted read access.
Bring back something useful.
Relevant call chains, security-sensitive data flows, and suggested changes for review.
Inputs stay within an agreed scope. Findings and proposed actions are designed for your team to review. Exact integrations and data handling requirements will be defined as the product develops.
From a signal
to a next step.
A conceptual example of the workflow we’re designing. This is an illustration, not a live scan or product output.
Untrusted input reaches a query
request → service → database- OBSERVATION
- A request parameter is combined with query text.
- INVESTIGATE
- Trace validation and query construction across the call chain.
- NEXT STEP
- Consider a parameterized query and test the affected flow.
Planned workflow for Code Guardian. Inputs, integrations, and supported actions will evolve during development.
A conceptual workflow for Code Guardian. Select a stage to highlight the part of the investigation it supports.
Choose the code
Select a repository or change set and define what the agent may read.
Trace the behavior
The agent follows relevant calls and data flow around a security concern.
Review the change
A developer evaluates the evidence and proposed remediation before merging.
Where Code Guardian
fits.
You have a repository or change set and want to understand how input, validation, and sensitive operations connect.
For what a running application actually allows, AppShield focuses on routes, roles, and application behavior.
ASAppShieldThese are planned areas of focus. Cross-agent integrations and supported workflows are still being defined.
Before you
ask.
Can I use Code Guardian today?+
Code Guardian is in development. We’re open to early conversations about your use case and can share progress as the product takes shape.
Will it automatically merge code?+
The planned workflow keeps code changes under developer review. An agent’s suggestion is a starting point for evaluation, not an automatic merge.
Which languages will it support?+
Language support is still being defined. Tell us about your stack so we can understand which ecosystems matter to early teams.